Can the programme be delivered in English?

Delivery is normally in Chinese. English-language delivery and English documentation can be arranged for teams selling into overseas markets; tell us the audience when you enquire.

How many days does it take?

It is scoped by headcount and by how many scenarios you want covered. Pricing follows the same two variables.

What does success look like afterwards?

The team runs its own baseline, computes its own mention rate, and applies the rewrite checklist without us in the room. If that is not happening a month later, the follow-up session exists to find out why.

We are in a regulated industry — does that work?

Yes, and it changes the material. The programme then codifies what may and may not be claimed, and where human review sits in the publishing flow, rather than only teaching technique.

In-house AI marketing training

AI marketing training built on your own products, customers’ questions and content library, so the team can run a GEO diagnosis and a content rewrite without us.

The difference between this and the public bootcamp is the teaching material. In the bootcamp each participant brings their own brand; in-house, the entire room works on one company — your product lines, the questions your customers actually ask, your existing content library. The acceptance criterion is blunt: the team can build a question set, compute mention rate, and judge whether an edited draft has become easier for a model to quote.

Who it is for

Marketing, brand, content or e-commerce teams of eight or more who want one shared standard for AI writing and GEO
Teams already writing with AI but producing inconsistent quality, with no reviewable standard
Regulated industries — pharmaceutical, for example — that need what may and may not be written encoded into the workflow

Not a fit:

Teams of one or two people. The public bootcamp is better value.

How we run it

Pre-programme research. We review your content library, publishing workflow and division of labour, and select three real scenarios to use as case material.
Custom material. Slides rewritten around your product documentation and your customers’ questions. No generic examples.
Hands-on session. Teams run a baseline, rewrite copy and re-test, producing comparable numbers the same day.
Leave a standard behind. The rewrite rules become a checklist and a prompt library, handed to whoever owns the workflow.

What you get

Custom slide deck and recording
Content rewrite checklist, prompt library, question-set template
The diagnostic data and sample rewrites produced during the session
One follow-up online Q&A after the programme

Related cases

Wuhan Bilin Technology

Engagement documented; no quantitative results published.

Kechuang No.1

100%15 Jun 2026 · Yuanbao mention · 15/15
80%15 Jun 2026 · Yuanbao first recommendation · 12/15

Evidence note: 100% / 80% is a 15 June 2026 Yuanbao snapshot for Kechuang No.1 (15/15 mentioned; 12/15 first-recommended). 90% / 70% is a 14 June 2026 Yuanbao snapshot for the Shanghai Institute (9/10; 7/10). The fixed question sets, raw JSON answers and screenshots are archived internally. These are dated single-platform snapshots, not a current state or a promise; later two-platform snapshots were 80% / 60% and 80% / 70%, respectively.

Questions we get asked

Can the programme be delivered in English?: Delivery is normally in Chinese. English-language delivery and English documentation can be arranged for teams selling into overseas markets; tell us the audience when you enquire.
How many days does it take?: It is scoped by headcount and by how many scenarios you want covered. Pricing follows the same two variables.
What does success look like afterwards?: The team runs its own baseline, computes its own mention rate, and applies the rewrite checklist without us in the room. If that is not happening a month later, the follow-up session exists to find out why.
We are in a regulated industry — does that work?: Yes, and it changes the material. The programme then codifies what may and may not be claimed, and where human review sits in the publishing flow, rather than only teaching technique.